Remember Me? What's New? Advanced Search. Results 1 to 4 of 4. Thread: Different Scenarios about Rulings. Different Scenarios about Rulings Hello all As i have received different answers from judges to my questions in the past i will ask here in the forum.
Scenario 1: I control a Leyline of Sancity. He declares attackers and attacks me with both creatures, i response with Repeal targeting Eidolon. Do i get this damage in face of controlling the Leyline? Oracle Text of Eidolon: Whenever a player casts a spell with converted mana cost 3 or less, Eidolon of the Great Revel deals 2 damage to that player. Oracle Text of Leyline: If Leyline of Sanctity is in your opening hand, you may begin the game with it on the battlefield.
You have hexproof. You can't be the target of spells or abilities your opponents control. I know that on Eidolon it's not written with "target" but this would just sound stupid "Eidolon of the Great Revel deals 2 damage to that target player" Sulfuric acid irritates the mucous epithelium of the respiratory system, causes irritation and inflammation in the upper respiratory tract, and abundant production of mucous in the bronchial tree.
Exposure to sulfuric acid vapours is associated with an increased risk of laryngeal cancer. Therefore, pollution control during zinc production is essential to reduce sulfuric acid vapours concentrations. It is widely accepted that wet air scrubbing is one of the most effective ways of removing pollutants from the air. Most wet air scrubbers can work with both vapours and particulate matter.
The ability to utilize both water and other chemical compounds provides zinc manufacturers an effective way of air pollution control. If you search for the best air treatment device to improve air quality , you can buy a high-tech completely new type of wet scrubber — a Multi-Vortex wet air scrubber produced by Redwood Technology.
To get him to block, Estratti had to represent the ultimate threat and had to threaten the one thing that was more important than the Beguiler—he had to threaten to win the game. This one is a little bit trickier, but just as effective. His opponent, smelling blood, uses the Counterspell on the Stifle.
My friend then proceeds to reveal a land to the Dark Confidant trigger, draws Threads of Disloyalty , and plays it on the Tarmogoyf, winning the game. The player to analyze here is my friend, who recognized he could present his opponent with a scenario where he would win the game immediately, and that would perhaps be too good to pass up. And he knew that if he managed to plant that idea, then the opponent would spend their counterspell on the irrelevant Stifle, allowing them to resolve Threads , and immediately convert the intangible advantage of misleading the opponent into the concrete advantage of stealing the Tarmogoyf.
Another scenario is to purposely miss your land drop to cause your opponent to overextend. Something is wrong here. Brad had a hand of 2 Day of Judgments and a Wall of Omens. This made his opponent believe Brad had drawn the Day of Judgment off the Wall of Omens —after all, why would you ever play it before if you were planning on clearing the board anyway?
His opponent then proceeded to play all his creatures, and Brad killed all of them with his second Day of Judgment. This is another spot in which the player is spending tangible resources—he threw a Wall of Omens away—to get intangible gains planting the idea that he does not have another Day of Judgment in hand.
To Brad, the idea was worth more than the Wall of Omens because he would be able to kill more creatures with his sweeper at a later time. If his opponent had, for example, no cards in hand, then conveying this idea would not have been worth a Wall of Omens because it would not have changed the way the opponent played in a way that favored Brad enough to be worth it.
My opponent kept his hand, and played a turn-2 Counterbalance. My opponent accepted the small tempo sacrifice because he knew that the act of not playing Top turn 1 would convey information to me, and he knew I would use this information to make a decision in a direction that he wanted me to go. Sometimes you manage to convince them that a certain situation exists, but they can do nothing to stop it, so they act as if they were wrong, which is not what you want.
0コメント